Lost at Sea
one chance can fail key choice 1 achievement pointSearch for the wreckage of the Annabel Lee.
How to start
1 technical condition
Dialogue spoilers
Walkthrough spoilers
- Find the Shipwreck near the Oil RigsSail to the Oil Rigs. Bonaventure mentioned the ship probably sank there.To complete· Bonaventure: in wreckage area or has
Boat Name Plate - Fish for WreckageSearch the sea near the Oil Rigs for a shipwreck. Use the boat's scanner for traces.Catch
Boat Name Plate ×1 - Discuss the Catch with AvaYou found something in the area around the supposed shipwreck. Discuss it with Ava.Talk to Ava (Find the plaque)Clues· has
Boat Name PlateDialogue spoilers
- Talk to Salt PeteFind someone who can translate Sang-Ha sailor cant.Talk to Salt Pete (Salt Pete confirms)
Dialogue spoilers
- Return to BonaventureDecide whether to break the news about the wreck to Bonaventure.Talk to Bonaventure (Tell Bonaventure the Truth or Lie)
DialogueCan fail the quest spoilers
Other conversations
Can finish the quest spoilers
Rewards spoilers
Key choices and quests it may exclude spoilers
Expand a section to see it. Key choices: clues come from dialogue branches and may not be exact.
This quest can fail in 1 conversation on this page, marked in red. Inside, a red outcome shows the choice or ending that leads there, per the game data.
Every conversation of this quest, line by line. The choices listed under each line are the game's own, taken from its dialogue files (game build 25680465) in the order those files list them. Outcomes listed for a choice come from the game's dialogue scripts. That each one applies when you pick it is our reading of the data, not confirmed in game. Conditions shown as “if you chose …” or “after …” come from where the game data sets that story flag; other events may change it too. A choice marked “ask once” records a story flag when you pick it, and its own condition needs that flag unset. A chip such as “Name +1” is a counter that, per the game data, only this conversation changes. Conditions on it are counted from earlier answers in this conversation; that is our reading of the data, and the counter's starting value is not confirmed.
Found a data error?