The Bicameralist

1 achievement point
Given by Samuel Jaynes

Ava thinks something might be off with the strange Bicameral Monk. Might be worth investigating.

How to start

Starts after a conversation with Ava (Discussing Jaynes with Ava)
Clues
1 technical condition
Story flags the game uses internally. Shown for reference; you can't check them in game.
· Ava: old network researched
Dialogue2 decisions spoilers

Quest chain

BeforeWhere is Ava?
Walkthrough2 steps · 2 conversations spoilers
  1. Get to know Samuel Jaynes
    Talk to Samuel again to learn more about the voices he's hearing.
    Talk to Samuel Jaynes, Ava (Return to Samuel)
    Dialogue7 decisions spoilers
  2. See how Samuel is doing
    Samuel seems to have an implant of some sort under his eyes. He's hearing voices, strange voices. Check in on him!
    Talk to Samuel Jaynes, Ava (Samuel Starts Leaking)
    Clues
    1 technical condition
    Story flags the game uses internally. Shown for reference; you can't check them in game.
    · The Ghost: spoke to samuel
    Dialogue12 decisions spoilers
Rewards spoilers
Possible rewardsrecipe Chicken Shakerecipe Apple PieSamuel Jaynes Friendship +11Samuel Jaynes Business +10Samuel Jaynes Romance +10Ava Friendship +1Ava Romance +1

Expand a section to see it. Key choices: clues come from dialogue branches and may not be exact.

Every conversation of this quest, line by line. The choices listed under each line are the game's own, taken from its dialogue files (game build 25680465) in the order those files list them. Outcomes listed for a choice come from the game's dialogue scripts. That each one applies when you pick it is our reading of the data, not confirmed in game. Conditions shown as “if you chose …” or “after …” come from where the game data sets that story flag; other events may change it too. A choice marked “ask once” records a story flag when you pick it, and its own condition needs that flag unset. A chip such as “Name +1” is a counter that, per the game data, only this conversation changes. Conditions on it are counted from earlier answers in this conversation; that is our reading of the data, and the counter's starting value is not confirmed.

Found a data error?